Frequency Of Fetal Central Nervous System Anomalies Detected on Ultrasonography

CNS Anomalies Detected on Ultrasonography

Authors

  • Abeeha Azam URSMIT, The University of Lahore Gujrat, Campus
  • Nosheen Arshad The University of Chenab, Gujrat
  • Abid Ali Department of Allied Health Sciences, The University of Chenab, Gujrat
  • Muhammad Ahmad Naeem The University of Chenab, Gujrat
  • Sadia Ishtiaq URSMIT, The University of Lahore Gujrat, Campus
  • Rabia Saleem Umer Diagnostic Center, Sialkot

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v5i8.766

Keywords:

CNS Anomalies, Ventriculomegaly, Acrania, Encephalocele, Agenesis of cerebellar vermis

Abstract

The most serious congenital abnormalities are those involving the central nervous system (CNS). Ultrasound (US) examination is a safe and noninvasive method for detecting these anomalies during pregnancy. Objective: To find out the frequency of the fetal central nervous system anomalies detected on ultrasonography. Methods: It was a cross sectional study conducted on 385 pregnant women using Convenient Sampling Technique. The patients were referred by obstetricians/gynecologists for routine obstetrical scan. Data was collected from two hospital settings, Allama Iqbal Memorial Teaching Hospital, Sialkot and Umer Diagnostics, Sialkot. The study used a high resolution ultrasound probe with a frequency of 3.5 MHz to identify CNS anomalies in 13 embryos. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26.0. Results: 13 fetuses with CNS anomalies were found after 385 pregnant women underwent transabdominal sonography. Anomalies included 2(0.5%) ventriculomegaly, 3(0.8%) acrania, 2(0.5%) encephalocele, 2(0.5%) bilaterally present choroid plexus cyst, 2(0.5%) hydrocephalus, 1(0.3%) agenesis of cerebellar vermis along with mega cisterna magna. Conclusions: Acrania is most common among all CNS anomalies. Disability and bed rest are the two most serious consequences of major CNS abnormalities, early detection of these conditions is now crucial. Another significant problem is family counseling.

References

Yinon Y, Katorza E, Nassie DI, Ben-Meir E, Gindes L, Hoffmann C, et al. Late diagnosis of fetal central nervous system anomalies following a normal second trimester anatomy scan. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2013 Oct; 33(10):929-34. doi: 10.1002/pd.4163

Arslan E, Büyükkurt S, Sucu M, Özsürmeli M, Mısırlıoğlu S, Demir SC, et al. Detection of major anomalies during the first and early second trimester: Single-center results of six years. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association. 2018 Aug; 19(3):142-145. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.2017.0125

Springhall EA, Rolnik DL, Reddy M, Ganesan S, Maxfield M, Ramkrishna J, et al. How to perform a sonographic morphological assessment of the fetus at 11-14 weeks of gestation. Australasian Journal of Ultrasound Medicine. 2018 Aug; 21(3):125-137. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12109

Bardi F, Smith E, Kuilman M, Snijders RJM, Bilardo CM. Early Detection of Structural Anomalies in a Primary Care Setting in the Netherlands. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 2019; 46(1):12-19. doi: 10.1159/000490723

Troisi J, Landolfi A, Sarno L, Richards S, Symes S, Adair D, et al. A metabolomics-based approach for non-invasive screening of fetal central nervous system anomalies. Metabolomics. 2018 May; 14(6):77. doi: 10.1007/s11306-018-1370-8

Onkar D, Onkar P, Mitra K. Evaluation of Fetal Central Nervous System Anomalies by Ultrasound and Its Anatomical Co-relation. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014 Jun; 8(6):AC05-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8052.4437

Van Sloun RJ, Cohen R, Eldar YC. Deep learning in ultrasound imaging. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2019 Aug; 108(1):11-29. doi: 10.1109/jproc.2019.2932116

Ding WP, Li N, Chen M. Ultrasound Screening of Fetal Anomalies at 11-13+ 6 Weeks. Maternal-Fetal Medicine. 2020 Jul; 2(03):175-80. doi: 10.1097/fm9.0000000000000045

De Catte L, De Keersmaeker B, Claus F. Prenatal neurologic anomalies: sonographic diagnosis and treatment. Paediatric Drugs. 2012 Jun; 14(3):143-55. doi: 10.2165/11597030-000000000-00000

Edwards L and Hui L. First and second trimester screening for fetal structural anomalies. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2018 Apr; 23(2):102-111. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2017.11.005

Pang B, Pan JJ, Li Q, Zhang X. Accuracy of ultrasonography in diagnosis of fetal central nervous system malformation. World Journal of Clinical Cases. 2021 Sep; 9(27):8027-8034. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8027

Vayna AM, Veduta A, Duta S, Panaitescu AM, Stoica S, Buinoiu N, et al. Diagnosis of Fetal Structural Anomalies at 11 to 14 Weeks. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2018 Aug; 37(8):2063-2073. doi: 10.1002/jum.14561

Engels AC, Joyeux L, Brantner C, De Keersmaecker B, De Catte L, Baud D, et al. Sonographic detection of central nervous system defects in the first trimester of pregnancy. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2016 Mar; 36(3):266-73. doi: 10.1002/pd.4770

Drukker L, Bradburn E, Rodriguez GB, Roberts NW, Impey L, Papageorghiou AT. How often do we identify fetal abnormalities during routine third-trimester ultrasound? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2021 Jan; 128(2):259-269. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16468

Norton ME, Fox NS, Monteagudo A, Kuller JA, Craigo S. Fetal Ventriculomegaly. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020 Dec; 223(6):B30-B33. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.182

Casather DM and Atapattu H. Fetal acrania: A case report and review of literature.

Gole RA, Meshram PM, Hattangdi SS. Anencephaly and its associated malformations. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2014 Sep; 8(9):AC07-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/10402.4885

Cruz AJM and De Jesus O. Encephalocele. StatPearls [Internet]: StatPearls Publishing; 2021

Monteagudo A. Holoprosencephaly. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020 Dec; 223(6):B13-B16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.178

Paladini D and Volpe P. Ultrasound of congenital fetal anomalies: differential diagnosis and prognostic indicators. CRC press; 2018 Mar. doi: 10.4324/9780429462450

Karim JN, Roberts NW, Salomon LJ, Papageorghiou AT. Systematic review of first-trimester ultrasound screening for detection of fetal structural anomalies and factors that affect screening performance. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017 Oct; 50(4):429-441. doi: 10.1002/uog.17246

Ghavami M and Abedinzadeh R. Prevalence of perinatal central nervous system anomalies in East azarbaijan-iran. Iranian Journal of Radiology. 2011 Sep; 8(2):79-81

Zhang N, Dong H, Wang P, Wang Z, Wang Y, Guo Z. The Value of Obstetric Ultrasound in Screening Fetal Nervous System Malformation. World Neurosurgery. 2020 Jun; 138:645-653. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.014

Amer N, Amer M, Kolkailah M, Al-Dumairy M. Foetal central nervous system anomalies: frequency and foeto-maternal outcome. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 2014 Nov; 64(11):1282-6

Tutus S, Ozyurt S, Yilmaz E, Acmaz G, Akin MA. Evaluation and prevalence of major central nervous system malformations: a retrospective study. Northern Clinics of İstanbul. 2014; 1(2):78. doi: 10.14744%2Fnci.2014.84803

Downloads

Published

2022-08-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pbmj.v5i8.766
Published: 2022-08-31

How to Cite

Azam, A., Arshad, N. ., Ali, A. ., Ahmad Naeem, M. ., Ishtiaq, S. ., & Saleem, R. . (2022). Frequency Of Fetal Central Nervous System Anomalies Detected on Ultrasonography: CNS Anomalies Detected on Ultrasonography. Pakistan BioMedical Journal, 5(8), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v5i8.766

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>