Varicocele Surgery: Three Years Experience

Varicocele Surgery

Authors

  • Suleyman Sagır Department of Urology, Mardin Artuklu University, Artuklu, Turkey
  • Mustafa Azizoglu Department of Pediatric Surgery, Dicle University, Sur, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v6i08.908

Keywords:

Varicocele, Fertility, Men

Abstract

Despite available treatments like varicocelectomy, a standard therapy remains controversial. Varicocele repair has shown promise in improving sperm parameters, but further research is needed, especially in nonobstructive azoospermia cases. Techniques such as microscopic testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection have shown some success in achieving pregnancies. Objective: To articulate our hands-on experience and understanding pertaining to varicocele. Methods: This study included patients who presented to our clinic due to varicocele and underwent surgical procedures between November 2020 and January 2023. Results: This research involved 26 varicocele patients, primarily age rage was 27.5 years old. The majority (85%) had varicocele on the left side, and 15% had bilateral varicocele. The mean vein diameter was 3.58mm and 2.6mm for the left side and bilateral cases respectively, with a general average of 3.45mm. Analysis of sperm count, motility, and morphology reflected an average of 32.6 million/ml, 23.2%, and 5.23%, respectively. An average of 4.45 veins was ligated during surgery, with a slight variance based on the side. One patient lost approximately 85% of the testicular blood supply due to a complication during surgery, leading to testicle hardening without atrophy. Two patients experienced recurrence (7.6% recurrence rate). Negative and positive correlations were found between the number of ligated veins and preoperative sperm count (p=0.043, r=-0.408), and vein diameter and preoperative sperm morphology (p=0.004, r=0.544), respectively. Conclusions: Despite the limitations, our study provides valuable insights into the relationship between varicocele severity and sperm parameters.

References

Jensen CF, Østergren P, Dupree JM, Ohl DA, Sønksen J, Fode M. Varicocele and male infertility. Nature Reviews Urology. 2017 Sep; 14(9): 523-33. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2017.98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2017.98

Masson P and Brannigan RE. The varicocele. Urologic Clinics. 2014 Feb; 41(1): 129-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2013.08.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2013.08.001

Cho CL, Esteves SC, Agarwal A. Indications and outcomes of varicocele repair. Panminerva Medica. 2019 Jun; 61(2): 152-63. doi: 10.23736/S0031-0808.18.03528-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S0031-0808.18.03528-0

Johnson D and Sandlow J. Treatment of varicoceles: techniques and outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2017 Sep; 108(3): 378-384. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.020

Silay MS, Hoen L, Quadackaers J, Undre S, Bogaert G, Dogan HS, et al. Treatment of Varicocele in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology/European Society for Paediatric Urology Guidelines Panel. European Urology. 2019 Mar; 75(3): 448-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.042

Kramolowsky EV, Wood NL, Donovan JF, Sandlow JI. Randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic varix ligation for the treatment of infertility. Journal of Urology. 1997; 157(4): 143.

Tulloch WS. A consideration of sterility factors in the light of subsequent pregnancies. II. Subfertility in the male. Edinburgh Medical Journal. 1952 Mar; 59(3): T29.

Baazeem A, Belzile E, Ciampi A, Dohle G, Jarvi K, Salonia A, et al. Varicocele and male factor infertility treatment: a new meta-analysis and review of the role of varicocele repair. European Urology. 2011 Oct; 60(4): 796-808. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.018

Majzoub A, Elbardisi H, Arafa M, Agarwal A, Al Said S, Al Rumaihi K. Does the number of veins ligated during varicococele surgery influence post‐operative semen and hormone results?. Andrology. 2016 Sep; 4(5): 939-43. doi: 10.1111/andr.12226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12226

Chan P. Management options of varicoceles. Indian journal of urology: IJU: Journal of the Urological Society of India. 2011 Jan; 27(1): 65. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.78431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.78431

Mirilas P and Mentessidou A. Microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in children, adolescents, and adults: surgical anatomy and anatomically justified technique. Journal of Andrology. 2012 May; 33(3): 338-49. doi: 10.2164/jandrol.111.013052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2164/jandrol.111.013052

Beck EM, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a macroscopic and microscopic study. The Journal of Urology. 1992 Oct; 148(4): 1190-4. 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36857-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36857-X

Kupis Ł, Dobroński PA, Radziszewski P. Varicocele as a source of male infertility–current treatment techniques. Central European Journal of Urology. 2015; 68(3): 365. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.642 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2015.642

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility. 2014 Dec; 102(6): 1556-60. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.007

Palomo A. Radical cure of varicocele by a new technique: preliminary report. The Journal of Urology. 1949 Mar; 61(3): 604-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)69113-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)69113-4

Lai CZ, Chen SJ, Huang CP, Chen HY, Tsai MY, Liu PL, et al. Scrotal Pain after Varicocelectomy: A Narrative Review. Biomedicines. 2023 Apr; 11(4): 1070. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11041070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041070

Collodel G, Ferretti F, Masini M, Gualtieri G, Moretti E. Influence of age on sperm characteristics evaluated by light and electron microscopies. Scientific Reports. 2021 Mar 2;11(1):4989. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84051-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84051-w

Tauber R and Johnsen N. Antegrade scrotal sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicocele: technique and late results. The Journal of Urology. 1994 Feb; 151(2): 386-90. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)34956-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)34956-X

Shebl SE, Ali S, El Gammal A. Intraoperative hydrodissection and Doppler ultrasound during magnified varicocelectomy: A comparative study. Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia. 2023 Feb; 95(1). doi: 10.4081/aiua.2023.11008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2023.11008

Chung KL, Hung JW, Yam FS, Chao NS, Li DC, Leung MW. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic Palomo surgery vs scrotal antegrade sclerotherapy in adolescent varicocele. The Journal of Urology. 2023 Mar; 209(3): 600-10. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003087

Downloads

Published

2023-08-31
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pbmj.v6i08.908
Published: 2023-08-31

How to Cite

Sagır, S. ., & Azizoglu, M. . (2023). Varicocele Surgery: Three Years Experience: Varicocele Surgery. Pakistan BioMedical Journal, 6(08), 08–12. https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v6i08.908

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit