Efficacy of Different Herbal and Chemical-Based Hand Sanitizers to Control the Microbial Growth on the Hands of Bank Cashiers

Herbal and Chemical-Based Hand Sanitizers: Microbial Growth on the Hands of Bank Cashiers

Authors

  • Zanib Maqsood Conservation Biology Lab, Institute of Zoology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Bushra Nisar Khan Conservation Biology Lab, Institute of Zoology, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Habib Ur Rehman Department of Zoology, Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalnagar Campus, Bahawalnagar, Pakistan
  • Romana Zulfiqar Department of Zoology, Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalnagar Campus, Bahawalnagar, Pakistan
  • Hira Maqsood Department of Zoology, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan
  • Aazba Naeem Institute of Zoology, University of Okara, Okara, Pakistan
  • Umm E Barza Department of Zoology, Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalnagar Campus, Bahawalnagar, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v8i11.1302

Keywords:

Hand Washing, Herbal Sanitizers, Bank Cashiers, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli

Abstract

Hand hygiene plays a vital role in reducing the transmission of infectious diseases, principally in occupations involving the regular handling of contaminated objects, such as currency notes. Objectives: To estimate the effectiveness of three classes of hand sanitizers, including commercial non-alcoholic, alcoholic, and lab-prepared herbal formulations, for reducing microbial growth from the hands of bank cashiers in Lahore. Methods: This experimental study evaluated 32 cashiers aged 25–40 years for sanitizer efficacy. Samples were gathered from both hands before sanitizer application, after 25 seconds, mid-sampling 1 minute, and post-sampling after 1 hour. Results: The findings verified clear modifications among sanitizer types. Alcoholic sanitizers, mainly containing ethanol or isopropyl alcohol, were the most effective, attaining up to an 87% decrease in CFU count. In some alcoholic sanitizers, inhibition was 99.9%. Lab-prepared herbal sanitizers, including constituents such as aloe vera, neem, alum, and basil, reduced bacterial growth by up to 61%. The non-alcoholic sanitizers have also shown activity against bacterial growth and reduced CFU by up to 48%. The bacteria isolated by biochemical isolation were Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. A two-way ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey's test revealed significant decreases in CFU (colony-forming units) at p<0.0001 among all categories and proved alcoholic sanitizers to be the strongest antimicrobial agents. Conclusions: This result shows that alcoholic hand sanitizers are highly effective against hand-borne microbes in a real-life bank environment, suggesting their use as an integral component of hand hygiene interventions for cashiers.

References

Akinsulie OC, Aliyu VA, Idris I, Ajulo S, Olukogbe O, Ukauwa C et al. The Implications of Handwashing and Skin Hygiene on Infectious Disease Dynamics: The African Scenario. Hygiene. 2024 Nov; 4(4): 483-99. doi: 10.3390/hygiene4040036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/hygiene4040036

Alhalwani A, Husain A, Saemaldahar A, Makhdoum F, Alhakami M, Ashi R et al. The Impact of Alcohol Hand Sanitizer Use on Skin Health Between Healthcare Workers: Cross‐Sectional Study. Skin Research and Technology. 2024 Jan; 30(1): e13527. doi: 10.1111/srt.13527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.13527

Thakur A, Sharma L, Singh J. Kavita. Comparison Study of Non-Alcoholic Sanitizer and Alcohol Based Sanitizer. Recent Trends in Infectious Diseases. 2025; 2 (1): 11–22.

Jaradat ZW, Ababneh QO, Sha’aban ST, Alkofahi AA, Assaleh D, Al Shara A. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Public Fomites: A Review. Pathogens and Global Health. 2020 Nov; 114(8): 426-50. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2020.1824112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20477724.2020.1824112

Gedik H, Voss TA, Voss A. Money and Transmission of Bacteria. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control. 2013 Aug; 2(1): 22. doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-2-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-2-22

Saha T, Khadka P, Das SC. Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer–Composition, Proper Use and Precautions. Germs. 2021 Sep; 11(3): 408. doi: 10.18683/germs.2021.1278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2021.1278

Mahmood A, Eqan M, Pervez S, Alghamdi HA, Tabinda AB, Yasar A et al. COVID-19 and Frequent Use of Hand Sanitizers: Human Health and Environmental Hazards by Exposure Pathways. Science of the Total Environment. 2020 Nov; 742: 140561. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140561

Lotfinejad N, Peters A, Tartari E, Fankhauser-Rodriguez C, Pires D, Pittet D. Hand hygiene in Health Care: 20 Years of Ongoing Advances and Perspectives. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2021 Aug; 21(8): e209-21. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00383-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00383-2

Haque M, McKimm J, Sartelli M, Dhingra S, Labricciosa FM, Islam S et al. Strategies to Prevent Healthcare-Associated Infections: A Narrative Overview. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy. 2020 Sep: 1765-80. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S269315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S269315

Vuppu S, Mishra T, Chinamgari A. Use of Hand Sanitizers in COVID-19 Prevention: A Comprehensive Overview. Pharmacoepidemiology. 2023 Aug; 2(3): 257-71. doi: 10.3390/pharma2030022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharma2030022

Jing JL, Pei Yi T, Bose RJ, McCarthy JR, Tharmalingam N, Madheswaran T. Hand Sanitizers: A Review on Formulation Aspects, Adverse Effects, and Regulations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020 May; 17(9): 3326. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093326

World Health Organization. Hand Hygiene for All Initiative: Improving Access and Behaviour in Health Care Facilities. World Health Organization. 2020 Sep.

Nadia AB, Jannah SN, Purwantisari S. Isolation and Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria from Apis Mellifera Stomach and Their Potential as Antibacterial Using in Vitro Test Against the Growth of Staphylococcus Aureus and Salmonella Typhimurium. NICHE Journal of Tropical Biology. 2020 May 31; 3(1): 35-44.

Marotz J, Lübbert C, Eisenbeiss W. Effective Object Recognition for Automated Counting of Colonies in Petri Dishes (Automated Colony Counting). Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 2001 Sep; 66(2-3): 183-98. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2607(00)00128-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2607(00)00128-0

Singh P, Potlia I, Malhotra S, Dubey H, Chauhan H. Hand Sanitizer an Alternative to Hand Washing—A Review of Literature. Journal of Advanced Oral Research. 2020 Nov; 11(2): 137-42. doi: 10.1177/2320206820939403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2320206820939403

Thaddeus NI, Francis EC, Jane OO, Obumneme AC, Okechukwu EC. Effects of Some Common Additives on the Antimicrobial Activities of Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizers. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine. 2018 Mar; 11(3): 222-6. doi: 10.4103/1995-7645.228437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-7645.228437

Nzekwe IT, Agwuka OI, Okezie MU, Fasheun DO, Nnamani PO, Agubata CO. Designing an Ideal Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer: In Vitro Antibacterial Responses of Ethanol and Isopropyl Alcohol Solutions to Changing Composition. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists Open. 2021 Nov; 7(1): 5. doi: 0.1186/s41120-021-00038-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41120-021-00038-x

Abuga K and Nyamweya N. Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizers in COVID-19 Prevention: A Multidimensional Perspective. Pharmacy. 2021 Mar; 9(1): 64. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9010064. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy9010064

Golin AP, Choi D, Ghahary A. Hand Sanitizers: A Review of Ingredients, Mechanisms of Action, Modes of Delivery, and Efficacy Against Coronaviruses. American Journal of Infection Control. 2020 Sep 1; 48(9): 1062-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.06.182

Lim K, Li WY, Dinata A, Ho ET. Comparing the Antibacterial Efficacy and Functionality of Different Commercial Alcohol-Based Sanitizers. PLOS One. 2023 Mar; 18(3): e0282005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282005

Selam MN, Habte BM, Marew T, Bitew M, Getachew T, Getachew S et al. Evaluation of Quality and Antimicrobial Efficacy of Locally Manufactured Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizers Marketed in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia in the Era of COVID-19. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control. 2022 Oct; 11(1): 126. doi: 10.1186/s13756-022-01163-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-022-01163-2

Ismail A, Raya NR, Orabi A, Ali AM, Abo-Zeid Y. Investigating the Antibacterial Activity and Safety of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Versus A Commercial Alcohol-Based Hand-Sanitizer: Can Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles be Useful for Hand Sanitation? Antibiotics. 2022 Nov; 11(11): 1606. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11111606

Bayer G, Shayganpour A, Bayer IS. Efficacy of a New Alcohol-Free Organic Acid-Based Hand Sanitizer Against Foodborne Pathogens. Toxics. 2023 Nov; 11(11): 938. doi: 10.3390/toxics11110938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11110938

Gordon D. 14 Amoxicillin–Clavulanic Acid (Co-Amoxiclav). The Use of Antibiotics. 2010 Oct: 187. doi: 10.1201/b13787-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b13787-18

Umarkar MJ, Jibhkate PV, Thakare PG, Banarase NB, Gabhane KB, Salode VL. Alum-based Herbal Handwash: Formulation and Evaluation Study. Indian Journal of Pharmacy and Drug Studies. 2024 Oct; 3(3).

Danish P, Ali Q, Hafeez MM, Malik A. Antifungal and Antibacterial Activity of Aloe Vera Plant Extract. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal. 2020 Dec; 2020(1): 1-8. doi: 10.54112/bcsrj.v2020i1.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54112/bcsrj.v2020i1.4

Jothi D. Experimental Study on Antimicrobial Activity of Cotton Fabric Treated with Aloe Gel Extract from Aloe Vera Plant for Controlling the Staphylococcus Aureus (Bacterium). African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2009 May; 3(5): 228-32.

Sridhar S. Screening and Formulation of Hand Sanitizer with Herbal Extracts of Aloe Vera and Cinnamon. International Journal of Research and Review. 2024 Nov; 11(11): 20-25. doi: 10.52403/ijrr.20241103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20241103

Coventry E and Allan EJ. Microbiological and Chemical Analysis of Neem (Azadirachta Indica) Extracts: New Data on Antimicrobial Activity. Phytoparasitica. 2001 Oct; 29(5): 441-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02981863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981863

Latif MJ, Hassan SM, Mughal SS, Aslam A, Munir M, Shabbir N et al. Therapeutic Potential of Azadirachta Indica (Neem) and Their Active Phytoconstituents Against Diseases Prevention. Journal of Chemical Sciences. 2020; 10(3): 98-110.

Safety WP and World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care. World Health Organization. 2009.

Hygiene WH. WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care. WHO, Geneva. 2009.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pbmj.v8i11.1302
Published: 2025-11-30

How to Cite

Maqsood, Z., Khan, B. N., Rehman, M. H. U., Zulfiqar, R., Maqsood, H., Naeem, A., & Barza, U. E. (2025). Efficacy of Different Herbal and Chemical-Based Hand Sanitizers to Control the Microbial Growth on the Hands of Bank Cashiers: Herbal and Chemical-Based Hand Sanitizers: Microbial Growth on the Hands of Bank Cashiers. Pakistan BioMedical Journal, 8(11), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v8i11.1302

Issue

Section

Original Article

Plaudit

Most read articles by the same author(s)