smOOPs in Cancer: A Hypothetical Link Between Condensation-Prone RNAs and Oncogenesis

smOOPs in Cancer

Authors

  • Diki Diki Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Terbuka, Indonesia
  • Nisrina Khairunisa Department of Data Science, Faculty of Advanced Technology and Multidisciplinary, Airlangga University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v9i6.1367

Abstract

A key regulator of cellular function is a condensate that is developed in the liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) process, including RNAs. A newly identified class of condensation-prone RNAs is termed smOOPs (semi-extractable and orthogonal organic phase separation-enriched RNAs). Recently proposed by Klobučar et al. smOOPs represent an emerging and not yet fully characterized class of condensation-prone RNAs [1]. RNA plays essential roles in a wide range of cellular processes. This editorial discusses the characteristics of smOOPs, their role in cellular metabolism, as well as in early developmental stages. Besides, dysregulation of biomolecular condensation involving condensation-prone RNAs such as smOOPs may contribute to future studies of oncogenic processes. Although direct evidence linking smOOPs to cancer is currently lacking, the discovery of smOOPs provides a useful framework for investigating whether dysregulated condensation-prone RNAs may contribute to oncogenic processes.

One of the unique characteristics of smOOPs is their long transcript, folding internal structure, and special protein binding. It exhibits a high propensity for intermolecular interactions and tend to develop condensates. Protein binding in conventional RNA is low to moderate, while smOOPs are heavily bound by RNA-binding proteins. smOOP RNAs tend to exhibit more stable or highly structured conformations compared to many conventional mRNAs that have relatively flexible structures. Typically, smOOPs are rich in hairpin loops and bulges and very tight internal loops. In addition, smOOPs usually have complex secondary structures, bind many RNA-binding proteins (RBP), are located near chromatin, and develop an intermolecular network. There are differences between conventional RNA and smOOPs; while conventional RNA is easily extracted, smOOP RNA is not [1, 2].

Figure 1: The Structure of smOOPs

The RNA molecule is a scaffold during the early embryonic phase. For example, smOOPs can control gene expression, epigenetic, and mediate the development of the nuclear compartment. During embryonic development, smOOPs regulate the distribution of regulatory molecules. By keeping or releasing certain signal molecules in its condensate, smOOPs may take part in the regulation of molecular environments associated with differentiation and stemness [1].

Although direct evidence linking smOOPs to cancer is still lacking, the discovery of smOOPs provides a conceptual framework to investigate how aberrant condensation might contribute to oncogenesis. Dysregulation of biomolecular condensates has been strongly associated with various malignancies, including genomic instability, epigenetic rewiring, and aberrant oncogenic signaling [3, 4]. The recent discovery of smOOPs—a class of condensation-prone RNAs that act as scaffolds for phase separation raises the possibility that aberrant smOOP function may contribute to the pathological condensates observed in cancer [1].

Aberrant smOOP-mediated condensate formation may alter the spatial organization of oncogenic regulators, potentially leading to dysregulated gene expression, chromatin remodeling, and oncogenic signaling pathways. Several cancers have been associated with aberrant biomolecular condensates and altered RNA–protein interactions, suggesting a possible future role for smOOPs-related mechanisms in oncogenesis.  Those changes include not only changes in condensation that activate oncogenes and changes in proliferation control. However, current results that connect smOOPs directly to oncogenesis are still early, while most available studies of smOOPs focus on developmental biology and condensate formation.

References

Klobučar T, Novljan J, Iosub IA, Kokot B, Urbančič I, Jones DM et al. Integrative Profiling of Condensation-Prone RNAs During Early Development. Cell Genomics. 2026 Feb; 6(2). doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2025.101065. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xgen.2025.101065

Villanueva E, Smith T, Queiroz RM, Monti M, Pizzinga M, Elzek M et al. Efficient Recovery of the RNA-Bound Proteome and Protein-Bound Transcriptome Using Phase Separation (OOPS). Nature Protocols. 2020 Jul: 1-21. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-0344-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-020-0344-2

Jiang L and Kang Y. Biomolecular Condensates: A New Lens on Cancer Biology. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Reviews on Cancer. 2025 Feb; 1880(1): 189245. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2024.189245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbcan.2024.189245

Li W and Jiang H. Analysis of Phase-Separated Biomolecular Condensates in Cancer. In Cancer Systems and Integrative Biology. 2023 May: 345-356. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3163-8_23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3163-8_23

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30
CITATION
DOI: 10.54393/pbmj.v9i6.1367
Published: 2026-06-30

How to Cite

Diki, D., & Khairunisa, N. (2026). smOOPs in Cancer: A Hypothetical Link Between Condensation-Prone RNAs and Oncogenesis: smOOPs in Cancer. Pakistan BioMedical Journal, 9(6), 01–02. https://doi.org/10.54393/pbmj.v9i6.1367

Plaudit